Tulsi is entitled to her opinion on Syria and extra-congressionally approved, direct military actions. HOWEVER BOLTON IS CORRECT TO BRING UP HER PAST CRITICISM OF TRUMP’S ELIMINATION OF A TERRORIST AS AN ILLEGAL ACT OF WAR. To me that smacks of something a Liberal would say and doesn’t take into consideration how Low-Intensity Conflicts are fought in the modern battlefield of non-nation state aggressors (terrorists).
If her bias is toward an unobtainable congressional consensus before taking limited or specialized military action, how will she react if Trump wants to wage war, by assassinating Mexican Drug Cartel leaders using special operations teams, in a battle against Narco-Terrorists?
On a positive note, Gabbi’s tired of the same old song and dance the advocates of perpetual conflict foist upon the national conscience to justify their long-war militarism while ignoring our border invasion and deteriorating economy.
She’ll be a manager over intelligence, not an analyst or agent. She doesn’t need to know everything, just implement Trump’s vision of reformed intel services. Ones that oppose the more mercenary segments of the Military-Industrial Complex and their efforts to go against their political opponents, like Trump, who would curtail their actions and funding. Next, John Bolton will be denying the Military-Industrial Complex exists too, like he denies the existence of the Deep State.
Apparently, Bolton didn’t have a problem with Biden’s abuse of power targeting Gabbard with inclusion on a TSA Terror Watch List, or perhaps he’s just ignorant of that too. Or, maybe he’s the guy that wanted her put on that list…?
He’s pretty selective about his moral outrage. Perhaps his moral compass needs a little dusting off. Even a stopped moral compass is right twice a day, but I haven’t seen Bolton get much of anything right yet. The guy wanted to vote for Dick Cheney for President, and Cheney ended up voting for Kamala, a subversive Cultural Marxist.
Somebody put Bolton under investigation for consorting with the enemy of the people: the anti-American, CNN propaganda outlet. I wonder how much they are paying him to spout his opinions?