Video below

Good video. Consider this…Vatican II is valid. The New Mass is valid if said correctly but can be invalidated by the use of wrong language – as noted by theologians like Malachi Martin – or the evolution of the English language in which the meaning of the words changes. For instance, gay now means homosexual and not happy, dope means good and not something you shoot in your arm. Hence, the wisdom of using the Latin language whose meanings don’t change as a dead language. However, how can a valid Tridentine/Latin Mass ever be invalid and its practitioners schismatics/heretics when that Mass is eternal?

Who can declare the Pope a heretic? The Virgin Mary can point to Church errors via public/private revelations such as the message of Fatima, where it is said by those knowledgeable about its 3rd Secret – like the late Fr. Malachi Martin who read it – that it warned of an unprecedented internal apostasy and corruption originating from the highest levels of the Vatican hierarchy. How about the message of Our Lady of La Salette in 1845 that supposedly said “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist?” Doesn’t the Virgin Mary “outrank” the Pope being the Queen of Heaven? Doesn’t it make sense that’s why she would be used to convey messages from Heaven on important matters?

That is, because the Pope has authority – via the Keys of the Kingdom, to bind and unbind certain things on earth – and it could be seen as veritable license to act contrary to historical Church teaching (Marxist Liberation Theology/Globalist Humanist ethics/Liberal Synodality/persecution of Traditional Catholics), the Virgin Mary would have to intercede herself to warn of possible abuses and apostasy.

Didn’t the Virgin Mary ask to have the 3rd Secret revealed in 1960 as a warning, before Vatican II? Didn’t Pope John XXIII dismiss the Virgin’s request and take the authority on himself to warn that critics and realists were merely prophets of doom?” I certainly wouldn’t call the Virgin Mary a prophet of doom. Ten Years later, after Vatican II, didn’t Pope Paul VI say that “…the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God?” Doesn’t the Bible speak about a Great Apostasy and falling away?

What about the historical context of the Church teaching on matters of faith–aside from actions and pronouncements of opinion of the Pope? How about past errors like the Arian heresy which sucked a lot of clergy into the vortex; the historical rebuke of Pope’s by saints; and the mission of the Virgin Mary to crush the serpent’s lying, false, deceptive head (he was a liar and murderer from the beginning)?

Then consider the mystical (applied theological) repeat/recapitulation of certain themes by the Apostle Peter (i.e. the Pope), such as when he denied Christ three times and interpreted Christ’s mission in more earthly than heavenly terms (utopianism: like a modern-day speech before the UN on the Church’s role in fighting poverty, ignorance and Climate Change). Such that Christ had to rebuke Peter with “get behind me Satan (adversary)!” That although part of Christ’s mission was earthly, his main focus was on eternal salvation because the poor we would always have among us. Also evidenced theologically and spiritually, today, in a great poverty of spirit…