“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone…” And the sins of Bolton & Co. are many!

The other day Bolton was saying Trump’s picks were equivalent to Caligula naming his horse as counsel. Yet, he takes the side of not firing blatantly subversive General Milley. Why does Bolton want to preserve personnel and structures that are Deep State safe havens for the enemies within? Maybe because he’s been part of it, or so close to it.

Being an institutional man is not a virtue, in virtue of the type of corporate (institutional) sociopaths we have running these corrupted structures.

I’m not going to write another exhaustive criticism of delusional Bolton now. Maybe later.

I will say he’s correct to call out Gabbard on her criticism of the assassination of an Iranian terrorist, but her views can easily be adjusted and fine tuned to the realities of fighting unconventional warfare. She is not impervious to common sense and logic and obviously didn’t have access to the intelligence that led to the decision to take out Qasem Soleimani.

In context of what she said, it sounds like Tulsi was politicking and using exaggerated language–which is commonplace. Think irredeemables, deplorables, garbage…

Bolton’s selective outrage and inability to take responsibility for his own war mongering is far worse than Gabby’s flawed – in my opinion – prior statements. Actions speak louder than words. No doubt, Tulsi is a politician and a bit of an opportunist (what politician isn’t?).

What I think John fears is that she will take orders from Trump and carry out his cleanup of the domestic and foreign policy mess that the Marxist “Long March” through our institutions has wrought.

We have looked outward at our national security threats for far too long. Now it’s time to look inward…at the danger posed by the enemy within.

“Beware of the military-industrial complex.” And don’t take your eyes off the “government-media complex” either…